The similar phrase 'Worldly Christianity' is one used by Bonhoeffer. It's J Gresham Machen that I want to line up most closely with. See his Christianity and culture here. Having done commentaries on Proverbs (Heavenly Wisdom) and Song of Songs (Heavenly Love), a matching title for Ecclesiastes would be Heavenly Worldliness. For my stance on worldliness, see 3 posts here.

JOC Lectures on Scripture 4

Apologies for the delay in writing up the final morning of studies. We continued to look at Andy McGowan's problematic book. We discussed his idea of relocating our doctrine of Scripture in systematic theology, which seems a rather minor point in many ways. The changes of vocabulary he suggests could create as many problems as they may solve. His idea that Warfield's faulty (to McGowan) statement of the doctrine arose because of the heat of battle would not be one shared by Warfield himself. McGowan says there is no reference to Scripture in the early creeds (p 25) but Warfield says the opposite (p 106 of his book on Bible Inspiration). Inerrancy may not be a biblical doctrine but it is one that is discernible by implication. Although he complains of this McGowan himself does the same thing with his doctrine. Further, it is more than an implication - see Psalm 12:6, Jeremiah 42:5, 6, John 17:17. McGowan's suggestion that Bavinck is different to Warfield and superior to him is an overstatement.
We finished off with a discussion of the round table discussion article found in the current edition of Modern Reformation here (for subscribers).
A great week then. It was a privilege to be with Dr Campbell and with old friends Lewis, Wim (both doing the course), Ian (a graduate like myself) and Rich.

JOC Lectures on Scripture 2/3

Another stimulating two days have passed with Iain D Campbell and the other four doing the week's course at JOC.
On Day 2 we looked at Calvin - first the Institutes Book 1 and then, more interestingly, various places in the commentaries – the authorship of 2 Peter, early remarks in the Psalms, comments on Genesis 1 and 3, Matthew 2:6, 27:9 and 1 Peter 1:12. There is an essay on Calvin and inerrancy by Jim Packer in Volume 4 of his Shorter Writings. (See here too).
Then we came on to Karl Barth. I am not familiar with Barth but given that Greg Beale has accused Peter Enns of Barthianism and the fact Andy McGowan seems much under the spell of the Barthian Torrances his current influence cannot be denied. (Apparently Kevin VanHoozer has traced the recent history of this in Karl Barth And Evangelical Theology edited by Sung Wook Chung).
Barth's view, it appears, is rather elusive, but he distinguishes the Bible and revelation, speaks of recollection and anticipation, preparation and accomplishment and warns against absolutising a word that is always human. He calls the Bible the Word of God but what he means by that is not what we may mean. Bruce McCormack has labelled his view "Dynamic infallibilism". Barth spoke of the Word of God as the Word of GOD – God not being the object; the Work of God – an event not a storehouse of facts and the Miracle of God. He also warned against trying to shield ourselves from its offensiveness. He does not see the presence of God inhering directly in the book as such and says that we cannot decide just when the Bible is the Word of God. God, he says, is not ashamed of the fallibility of the word nor should we be. Mark Thompson has identified certain motifs in Barth - God's Lordship – he can't be mastered by a text; the centrality of Christ and the fact that God reveals himself dynamically so that things can change (see Gibson and Strange's Engaging with Barth).
We finished off the day with a summary of Peter Enns' very controversial Inspiration and incarnation. We mentioned the book in a previous blog here. Since then Enns has ceased to be a professor at Westminster. He has a
blog here. This blog is not recommended by any means.
On Wednesday we carried on with Enns this time in more critical fashion, considering some of the so called problem texts that he mentions in Proverbs, Acts, etc.
We then went on to the answer to Enns produced by Greg Beale The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism
We took up Beale's criticisms of the way Enns uses the incarnational analogy and Dr Campbell traced the more recent history of the subject. Gaussen (Theopneustia) and Shedd (in his Dogmatics) are in favour of it and Kuyper and Bavinck (as Gaffin reveals in his God's Word in Servant Form: Abraham Kuyper and Herman Bavinck on the Doctrine of Scripture see sample here) go into overdrive with it. Barth is fairly happy with the idea but sees overlappings and contradictions. Tom Torrance is similar.
It is Warfield who cautions against misusing of the analogy. Christ is a divine human person, Scripture is a divine human work. The analogy is therefore remote. Andy McGowan is not happy either (pp 119, 121). James Scott writing on Enns (WTJ Spring 2009) says it is a mistake to see Christ trapped in his culture. He concludes that Enns is saying something huge in his book when he writes as he does as the idea that the incarnate Christ misunderstood things is a major error.
We were also referred to John Goldingay's book on Model for interpretation of Scripture (pp 248-251 and a Lane Tipton article here. He points out that if the hypostatic union is unique, it cannot be an analogy. The only way forward is to focus on then on pneumatology. He also draws attention to the resurrection and ascension and how Scripture brings about regeneration, sanctification, etc.
We ended the day with summarising Andy McGowan's The Divine Spiration of Scripture. More tomorrow, God willing.

Expensive area?


An article here reveals that the borough in which I live (Barnet) boasts five of the country's most exclusive streets. Mouseprice street rankings make Ingram Avenue (Hampstead Garden Suburb) second most expensive in the country (average house price c £6 M). Nearby Winnington Road is sixth (average house price c £5.4 M) and Bishops Avenue is 16th (a mere £4.75 average). Third in the UK is Courtenay Avenue, which actually falls into Haringey. All three are situated between Highgate and Hampstead golf courses, which according to Mouseprice makes it “one of the most exclusive places to live in the country”.
Of most interest to us in Childs Hill are Eden Close and Elm Walk, "which border leafy Hampstead Heath in Childs Hill" eighth and 11th respectively (with average prices £4.9-5.1 M). I hasten to add that nearby are flats at £175-185 K or £195 K for two bedrooms - still not cheap but indicative of the variations in the area.

Tattoo

You can find more such examples of sciency tattoos here. When I was a boy it was more or less only blokes in the navy or prison who got tattoos. These days everyone gets them. It's something I really don't get. The Jews were forbidden to have tattoos. In part I think that is because it is difficult to take seriously someone covered in tattoos.

JOC Lectures on Scripture 1

It was my privilege once again today to be among the privileged few at the John Owen Centre in nearby Finchley for lectures this time from fellow blogger Iain D Campbell on the doctrine of Scripture. We began with brief biblical introduction (taking in Psalm 19, John 10:35, 2 Timothy 3:16, etc). We then went on to look at Westminster Theological Seminary and Scripture. We began with Machen (see this Daryl Hart essay via here) moved on to Murray (in the Infallible Word symposium, outline here) and E J Young (Thy Word is Truth). We also looked at Sinclair Ferguson in Harvie Conn's symposium (outline here).
We then turned to Old Princeton beginning with Turretin (whose tome Hodge would have used), passing over Hodge himself and focusing on Warfield, especially his inaugural address at Western in 1881 and his essay with A A Hodge on Inspiration (see here). I notice that several Warfield articles are here. In the afternoon we looked at the opening chapter of the Westminster Confession which, though familiar, was worth going through together its finely balanced statements.

DMLJ 27 More than notion


This is the "embarrassing one" we have been holding back. Embarrassment because the book commends what the infamous George Ella labels "Huntingtonian piety". It is "tainted", that is to say, by hyperism. J H Alexander is a pseudonym for a female writer. I think Lloyd-Jones just enjoyed the experientialism at a time when he thought some people were getting rather dry and doctrinal. The book is available online here.

More than notion by J H Alexander
Foreword
I am delighted to hear that there is a call for a second edition of this excellent book and am most happy therefore to write a word of commendation for it. It came into my hands almost accidentally. I had never heard of the author but the moment I began to read I was gripped and deeply moved.
There are some books of which it can be said that to read them is an experience, and one is never the same again. The extracts out of the lives of these various people who came in varied ways to a saving knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ are, at one and the same time, convicting and encouraging. Some were poor and ignorant, others well placed socially, and learned and cultured; but all came to the same glorious experience.
In reading about them one is shown the vital difference between a head knowledge of the Christian faith and a true heart experience.
In recommending it to the congregation at Westminster Chapel on a Friday night I said that it should be made compulsory reading for all theologians especially, but it will prove valuable also to those who long for a vital Christian experience.
Many who have read it as the result of my recommendation have testified to the blessing they have received. In one church known to me the reading of the book by one man led to a prayer-meeting such as they had not experienced before.
In these superficial and confused days I thank God for a book such as this and pray that He may bless it to countless souls.
D M Lloyd-Jones
Westminster Chapel
London
1965

CM 08 Khachaturian


So from Rimsky-Koraskov we move seamlessly to Aram Khachaturian and the Sabre Dance from the ballet Gayanne. The influence on me of Cardiffian Dave Edmunds whose Love Sculpture did a great electric version cannot be denied but its just a great piece of music however it's played. My mother used to enjoy giggling to it with her closest sister who died tragically young. This is a Mexican orchestra.

AHOCIA 100 Objects 08

JMiall, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
It is an interesting question as to when Christians of some sort were first to be found in this country. The evidence suggests it was fairly early on, perhaps 2nd Century. This mosaic is 4th century. In 314 three British bishops attended a church council in Arles (France) Eborius of York, Restitutus of London and Adelius of Caerleon in Gwent.

2000!

ImageChef.com - Custom comment codes for MySpace, Hi5, Friendster and more
Warm greetings to all who visit regularly or anyone just dropping in! This is my two thousandth post here.

London Welsh 2


We were among the 1,650 down at Old Deer Park this afternoon watching the rugby (not something I've ever done before, I confess). Yr Ysgol Gymraeg Llundain were singing before the game between London Welsh and Llanelli. Owain, my youngest, had the privilege of being one of the mascots who ran on with the team through the phalanx of Welsh guards and officials present. I've never seen a mascot in long trousers before (nor Welsh costume). We did leave before the end but not before we had seen all 30 points scored - a win for the Welsh but not enough to make progress in the cup certain despite a lot of pressure. Full report here.

British Library


I was in the King's Cross area on Friday (I'd been up to Welwyn to give my first lecture to the EMF students on heresy and the cults - nice lot, mainly Hungarian speaking) and so I decided to pop into The British Library. It's something I have often intended to do but haven't got round to. I was staggered to see that 12 years have elapsed since the new building went up. Where does the time go? There's so much in London. Nice atmosphere there with loads of people busy on their laptops. Found a nice remainder bookshop opposite selling books at £2 (what they should be?). There's a book there I want to read that I have never seen elsewhere.

Foot note

You will have read of the death of (former!) atheist Michael Foot. Like his successor, Neil Kinnock he was a known atheist. One wonders if the atheism was a factor in their not beoming PM. The British public are perhaps happier with a John Smith, a Gordon Brown or a Tony Blair. The other connection, between those two is their Gwent ties. They with two or three others are men with Gwent/Monmouthshire connections who went high but never to the very top. The ones I am thinking of together are

1. Aneurin Bevan (1897-1960) - Monmouthshire born and raised, MP for Ebbw Vale, founder of the NHS, who stood for Labour leadership in 1955 but lost to Gaitskell.
2. Roy Jenkins (1920-2003) - Monmouthshire born and raised MP who became Chancellor, Home Secretary and Deputy Labour leader 1970-1972 before leaving to form the SDP.
3. Michael Foot (1913-2010) - West country born MP who succeeded Bevan in Ebbw Vale (after 10 years in Plymouth) and was Labour Party leader 1980-1983 after Callaghan, before Kinnock.
4. Neil Kinnock (b 1942) - Monmouthshire born and raised MP who succeeded Foot as Labour leader and served 1983-1992.

Of the three Wales based men who became PM
1. Lloyd George (1863-1945) Liberal PM 1916-1922 was a North Walian
2. J Ramsay MacDonald (1866-1937) Labour PM 1924 and 1929-1935 though Scots was MP for Aberavon in South Wales the first time he was in office.
3. James Callaghan (1912-2005) Labour PM 1976-1979 was born in Portsmouth but was MP for Cardiff South (East)
Clearly the lesson is that a Monmouthshire connection takes you a long way but it will not get you the top job!

DMLJ 26 Blair Collection

What should be our penultimate foreword is from a collection of about 14 articles by Duncan M Blair under the heading The beginning of wisdom. The book or booklet first appeared in 1945, the year after Blair's death.
FOREWORD
BY D. MARTYN LLOYD-JONES, M.D., M.H.C.P.

It is with a high sense of privilege that I write a brief foreword to this collection of addresses delivered by my friend, the late Professor Duncan M. Blair.
When the unexpected and tragic news of his death reached me, I, together with all others who intimately had known him and his work, felt that something should be done to provide a permanent memorial to him and of him. And what better memorial could there be than this book which records his own words and the quintessence of his teaching?
There are some men who can be easily divorced from their addresses. Indeed, it can be said of them that they are in no way essential, as such, to their addresses. Their view of truth and their presentation of truth are so objective that in a sense their speeches could have been delivered by anyone. But there are others and of these the greatest and most illustrious example is the Apostle Paul who, though never anxious to obtrude themselves into their message, nevertheless are an integral part of the message. Their words, even when read, are never lifeless. As we read their words we see the speaker, we hear the voice, we see the familiar gestures and we are dominated by the sway of the powerful personality.
The late Professor Blair belongs to that group. In this book we not only read his words, but we are face to face once more with the man himself. For he was essentially a speaker and a teacher, and whatever he did, he did it "with all his might." All who ever had the privilege of listening to him will hear and see him again as they read these pages. It is indeed the ideal memorial to such a man.
That alone justifies a book like this. But there is another reason for its publication and one which would commend itself (and probably the only one which would commend itself) to Professor Blair himself. It is to propagate the truth which he believed, and by winch he lived ; and to perpetuate the work to which he gave himself so generously and untiringly.
The word "work" is not used in any mere conventional sense. I do not know of any man who has crowded more into a comparatively short life. It was a constant source of amazement to all his friends to know how he found the time for all his activities. His post as Regius Professor of Anatomy at Glasgow was a heavy task in itself, and especially to a man who was so conscientious and painstaking, and who so hated anything slip-shod or unworthy. But in addition to this, his activities in a purely religious sense were such as, I fear, to shame many of us who are whole-time ministers of the Gospel. It would be no exaggeration to say that he was the most outstanding religious layman in Glasgow. He was an active member of, and elder of, his local Church; Chairman of numerous Committees; and in constant demand as preacher and lecturer. He also had proved himself on countless occasions to be the perfect chairman of either a small devotional meeting or else a mass assembly of God's people in the largest halls in the city.
Nevertheless, it is true to say that his greatest work was done amongst students. I do not mean by that his work as professor of Anatomy, or the inevitable effect which his great personality had on all who studied under him. I refer specifically to his association with, and work for the Inter-Varsity Fellowship of Evangelical Unions. That association began in 1928 and continued until he was taken to his eternal reward. This was the sphere and the activity which appealed to him most of all, and increasingly he became the dominant personality in the work. He was made President of the Fellowship three times. But, unlike many whose association with the work ends when their year of office expires, his interest never flagged or failed. Regularly year by year he attended the annual Conference whether invited to speak or not and did all he could to help individual students by wise counsel and advice and generally to make the conference a success. At the time of his death, the tribute paid to him by the I.V.F. was that "He was a great Christian, a wise counsellor and a loyal friend." His wisdom and his knowledge, his tact and his sympathy and understanding made him an ideal chairman of committees. Above all, they singled him out as the obvious and heaven-sent leader in the international side of the work.
To all these activities he gave himself without stinting, happily and gladly;and he revelled in every moment of it. Being a Christian was no sinecure so far as he was concerned.
It may not be inappropriate at this time to attempt to assess the results of this great work and to discover the nature of his particular contribution to the common cause. What was the outstanding feature of his witness and the aspect of the truth concerning the Christian life which he emphasised and illuminated ? The answers to these questions are to be found in this book. I would direct attention particularly to the following matters which Professor Blair himself was always so anxious to emphasise.
The first is that the Christian can glorify God by his success and achievements in his work and profession, and that it is his duty to do so. Believing as he did in the doctrine of "common grace" this was inevitable. All powers and abilities are given by God and all knowledge is ultimately God's truth. An irrational dichotomy between sacred and secular is therefore something to be avoided. and Christian students must never place over against each other in competition their duties as Christians and their studies. Nor must they regard the latter as being unworthy of their wholehearted attention. It is the Christian's duty to do everything with all his might to the glory of God.
The next thing that stands out is that here was a man who gave the lie direct to the foolish assertion, made so often, that no true scientist can be a Christian. Here was an Anatomist, of all things, an expert in a subject that can so often be dry and mechanical, moreover an Anatomist profoundly interested in the subjects of Morphology, Comparative Anatomy and Genetics, and yet one who was not merely Christian in a formal general sense, but actively and militantly. The studies which are supposed to account for the scepticism and unbelief of so many simply went to confirm and increase his faith. He thereby demonstrated (what the Bible teaches everywhere) that unbelief has its origin in the heart and not in the mind. The words of John iii. 19 are still true - "This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil."
In other words his emphasis was always upon the wholeness of salvation. Salvation is not something that merely gives one a wonderful experience; it takes up and affects the whole man - emotions, will and intellect. Professor Blair was always anxious to stress the importance of the latter, and to show that nothing is really sane and reasonable save the Christian view and way of life. The result was that the note of Apologetics was always prominent in his addresses. This was not the basis of his faith, as it never should be, but it enabled him "to give a reason for the hope that was in him." Moreover, it accounted for his healthy dislike and indeed distrust of a weak and sentimental pietism that in a spirit of fear distrusts intellect and regards "the Queen of the Sciences" as being almost of the devil. This in turn led him to shew constantly the importance of a sound knowledge of the Bible and of theology as a background to one's witness. His upbringing in the Free Church of Scotland had not been in vain, and he was never tired of paying tribute to those who had led him as a boy and young man into the treasures and mysteries of the faith. I do not know that he ever said so, but he always gave the impression that the Shorter Catechism played a similar part in his Christian life to that of the spinal column in one's physical existence. It gave "backbone" and stability, it guaranteed order and system and arrangement, and above all it reminded one constantly "that we are His workmanship" and that our calling and election are sure and unshakeable.
That indeed was the secret of his life. He had accepted the revelation of God given in the scriptures. That led to a personal experience of Christ as His Saviour and then to an ever-increasing comprehension of the great plan of salvation. And everything he learned and discovered in his scientific work seemed to fit in with that plan and to reveal it still further. Such was the teaching of this beloved professor. As a man he was big in every sense - physical, moral, intellectual and spiritual. He was a true nobleman and a born gentleman. To those who think of men in terms of animals he can be likened to a great St Bernard dog. He was big and strong and yet gentle. He could be firm and severe when occasion demanded, but no man was ever more sympathetic or kindly in disposition. His zest and energy and keenness were unbounded, and all his friends agree in testifying that they never knew a happier man. Indeed, the word "gaiety" is the mot juste, in thinking of him. He radiated good cheer and friendliness and fellowship. His smile was a benediction. But nothing was so impressive as his humility and the reality and simplicity of his devotional life.
As so often happens when one tries to describe one of God's saints, one turns for the final word to the Pilgrim's Progress. John Bunyan has given a perfect portrait of Duncan Blair in Mr. Great-Heart. Countless students face to face with the dangers and errors and subtleties of life and with difficulties during their training and studies, have re-echoed the words of Mathew, the son of Christiana, who, turning to his mother and Mercy (when they were afraid of the dangers of their journey along the King's highway) said "Mother, fear nothing, as long as Mr. Great Heart is to go with us and to be our conductor." "This was a MAN ! "
D. M. Lloyd-Jones

Gwyl Dewi Sant



Yesterday was St David's Day, of course, and so like all Welsh people (you didn't?) we had cawl cennyn/leek soup and bakestones for tea. Owain, my youngest, also met the speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow who was involved this year in the annual St David's Day service in St Mary Undercroft. As usual, the London Welsh School took part, as did a male voice choir Eschoir. This time the children recited Ffrindiau bach a mawr and sang Dewi Sant.

London Welsh

To mark St David's day I thought I might do a little something on the four roads here in Childs Hill with Welsh names. It is the biggest concentration of such names in London. Elsewhere you will find one or two Welsh names but never, I believe, as many as four. Aral tradition suggests that they were given by a Welsh builder. There is still a Welsh builder nearby (D W Bevan) though that is probably a coincidence. The Welsh have been in London for centuries and there is no concentration of Welshies in Childs Hill or any other one area. The names of the streets are
Llanelly Road, Llanvanor Road, Crewys Road and Nant Road
The first (pronounced Lanuly locally) suggests a Llanelli connection. The second is perhaps the name of a farm. The third is a main road in Cardiff (there is no 'e' in the Cardiff version. It is pronounced Crooz locally). The fourth and most interesting is the Welsh for brook or stream, and indeed there is one although it is now almost entirely underground.
More interesting again is the fact that near Cross Ash in Monmouthshire, there is a small settlement called Llanfaenor with both a Nant Farm and a Great Crwys Farm too. There is a Llanelly not too far away. Perhaps that Welsh builder was from the same corner of Wales as me.
The local residents association is called CLAN after the three main streets of the four.