Yesterday, I was back at the Pastor's Academy perhaps for the last time. I was at the reading group leading a discussion of a new biography of Blaise Pascal by Graham Tomlin. The book is a fine piece of work and appears to give a full and fair description and assessment of the giant and genius that is Pascal. The below were written to provoke discussion, whuch they did. They plan to look at Oilgrim's Progress next, September 7.
Pastors
Academy Reading Group April 27 2026 [GB]
Blaise
Pascal, the man who made the modern world by Graham Tomlin [H & S
2025]
Impressions?
Did you enjoy it? What did you know of P beforehand? Can we trust
Tomlin?
Intro
[1-8]
Does Tomlin oversell P? Did P anticipate postmodernism?
1
Great Century [9-36]
How necessary is this chapter, how helpful? Is P an enigma [13]?
2/3
Majesty of Science [37-59]/Weighing the Air [60-73] Do
these chapters help us with the science versus religion debate? What are
the differences between P and Descartes? Would it be better today if
scientists were more open to changing their minds if the evidence
suggests it? [63] Do “Science & theology require different
methods”? [72] If so, why? “It is the heart that perceives God
not the reason”; true? [72]
4
Nothing Is Certain [74-96] Any
libertins
or
honnete hommes
today? What are the differences between P and Montaigne? How did they
see death similarly/differently? Where did they differ on attitudes
to self? What about man's insignificance/right responses to the human
condition? 'What do I know?' or 'What do I do?' [95]
5
Children of Port-Royal [97-123]
Is there an argument for sometimes abstaining from communion? What
about retreats? [102] What about contrition and attrition? [112] What
about pre-communion self-examination? [113] Does Chapter 5 help us on
the matter of living out “the spiritual life in the middle of the
world”? [121] What about providence – eg P not marrying, escaping
his crazy uncle, etc? [120, 122]
6
Night of Fire [124-149]
Is there a place for burying a talent? What do you make of P's
“second conversion”? How does it compare with Descartes' story?
Is it anti-physical at all?
7
Two Champions [150-168] Who
are the two champions; what difference does P highlight under their
names? Are Protestants far too confident that they, they alone, know
the true meaning of the Bible? [159] Is sceptical dogmatism/dogmatic
scepticism the right way to think?
8
Demented, Heretical or Jansenist? [169-196]
What do we say to the five propositions? Is God a capricious despot
moving pawns around? [172] Is there a blurring of Church and world
today and will instruction put things right? [174] Were Jansenists
Calvinists in disguise? [175; 112/3, 185] Would an entirely different
approach help us perhaps? Does ridicule have a place? [176] Is there
more of a need for popular writing? [178] Are there things to discuss
here about use of technology/ persecution? What about the Jesuit
views considered in letters 5 & 7? What do you make of the
discussion of grace 186-191? Are both Jesuits and Jansenists wrong?
Is it true to say heresy is often driven by an apologetic agenda, the
Jesuits being a prime example? [192/3] Was P a Jansenist?
9
Hidden God [197-220]
P speaks of the force of truth; a useful phrase? [197] What of his
commitment to Romanism? [198] “P was always a too big and
independent a mind and a character to fit ...” True or false? If
true, good or bad? [199] Ridicule and eloquence might amuse but do
not convert – discuss [201] Is the idea of God being hidden useful
[202]? “True miracles can never be performed by anyone … to
confirm an error” Is that a biblical position? [206] Are false
miracles a proof there are true ones? [207] Do people believe
miracles or not on the strength of evidence or what's in their
hearts? [208] Is this helpful on the incarnation? [209, 220] Is P's
doubt over creation's power to convert right? [212] It provides “too
much to deny and too much to prove”; true? [213] “... he must see
enough to know that he has lost him ...” Useful? [217]
10
Cleopatra’s Nose [221-244]
Is P helpful on politics? Did the Jansenists act Jesuitically? [243]
11
Distracting Ourselves to Death [245-267]
P was not content with conventional wisdom; is that a good thing?
[251] What of P's struggle to balance his love of maths, etc and his
love for God? [255] Is P helpful on distraction? Why is the most
pleasure in the chase? [260] How do Montaigne and P differ on
happiness? What about the long quotation 263?
12
Christianity Is Strange [268-293]
Was P pre-suppositionalist? [275] How do we learn to love people?
[276/7] Is P's order of arguing his case good? How do we escape
thinking only of the past and future? [287] What about the problem of
self-deception? Do we need to learn that we are monsters? [289] Is
the observation top of 292 about Adam true and helpful? Is
Christianity strange?
13
Make It Attractive [294-317]
Is it right to say that simply piling up rational arguments for faith
is a mistake? [299] What about “All those contradictions which
seemed to take me furthest from the knowledge of any religion are
what led me most directly to the true religion”? [302] How
important is it to stress that we need a Redeemer? [303] What about
his approach to Islam and the Old Testament? And the centrality of
Jesus Christ? [308] Is the realisation that revelation is
paradoxically hidden a helpful insight? [309] “Despite its total
implausibility”? [310] The importance of the cross? What about
pages 316, 317?
14
Spinning Coin at the Edge of the Universe [318-342] Atheism
– not a bad argument but a bad gamble?? [332] What about the power
of habit? [334] Confirmation bias?? [336] Three ways to believe?
[340]
15
Hate Your Self [343-364]
Does P define conversion well? [343] The competitive, deceiving,
divided, trivial self and the remedy? The right balance in hating
self?
16
If You Only Had a Week to Live [365-388]
What do we make of P and his critics?