On the third and final day we had two sessions. The first session looked at the final paper - that by Michael McClenahan asking about The Trinitarian resurgence? This looked at the way Moltman has had a lot of infuence on modern evangelicals (Stott, Leon Morris, Bruce Ware). We followed the usual pattern of a plenary presentation and then group work. McClenahan was keen, like others, for us to avoid mere biblicism and to make good use of the creeds.
The final session was a Q&A chaired by Paul Yeulett with all the speakers present. These are some of the questions discussed. Most were not addressed.
- How do we translate the lofty concepts we have discussed into "street "language for our congregations ?
- Isn’t Biblicism safer than trusting reason to deduce things by just and necessary consequence to the extent that Classical Theism does?
- If growth includes increasing dependency - on God - how can this be thought of as an imprint of God's non-dependency?
- Bob Letham: If you won't come clean on whether you are a Van Tillian, will you at least give us your take on presuppositionalism?
- Michael Mc: if we are rejecting biblicism, how do we avoid the noble and so well-ratified (by church tradition) practice of Marian veneration?
- How can we avoid drifting into Nestorianism when talking about the two natures of Christ?
- Tom Brand: If (p81) the answer to, ‘Where is God?’ is not the one given, of which Moltmann says, ‘Any other answer would be blasphemy’, what is a better answer?
- To all: Calvin denies (Heb 4:15) that Christ grew in mercy (p114). Rather, that he ‘experienced our misery is a gift to us’. Do you agree?
- If Christ has two wills, divine and human, does that mean he has two centres of self-consciousness?
- What did Jesus mean 'the Father is greater than I" in John 14:28 - is this referring to the economic trinity rather than the ontological trinity?
It has been a great time.