I thought this representation of the High Priest would be a good illustration but there is one obvious mistake here. Can you tell me what? I like spotting mistakes like this. If there 's a response I might try another one on you.
A blog featuring whatever I fancy, often on the Christian faith but not exclusively
6 comments:
I don't see any bells on the hem of the garment, but perhaps that's more my eyesight than a mistake in the diagram!!
Perhaps you do need glasses! What I was thinking of was further up. I just talked to my wife about it and she thought I might be reading Exodus 28 too strictly. I'll leave it a little while longer.
The ephod is missing.
Now you mention it, I can't see any richly ornamented robe. What I was referring to was the configuration of the gems, which on my reading of Exodus 28 (in English I admit) would suggest four rows of three gems not three rows of four. Ah well, I'll put another one up to bemuse.
Now I'm confused because the picture shows 4 rows of 3 anyway.
The ehpod is quite clearly missing - fancy you not spotting that!!;-)
Now we're into 'what is a row?'. I suppose we could have a row about rows! I see four columns of three. What about Elijah?
Post a Comment