Biblical guidance
As for biblical guidance
on the subject, there does not seem to be anything very much in the
New Testament. This is in part because the New Testament is very much
a book about beginnings and covers only a relatively short period in
history. James the Lord's brother in Jerusalem seems the one example
of a settled pastorate over many years. Tradition speaks very highly
of his impact in that city and it comes out in Scripture. Perhaps
there is something in the very title pastor or shepherd that
suggests a long term commitment to the sheep. Even a teacher
has to make some sort of time commitment if he is going to be
effective. Elder again conjures up someone committed for the
long haul until death intervenes.
When we turn to the Old
Testament we have examples of long periods of leadership in the case
of some of the kings and long periods of ministry in the case of some
of the priests and prophets. The very fact that Isaiah, Jeremiah and
Daniel had lengthy ministries in one place surely demonstrates that
on the face of it there is nothing to be said against a man
continuing long in a ministry in one place. John Wesley and others so
structured the Methodist connexion that no-one stayed very long
anywhere. One can see the wisdom in that, given the time and
situation, but whether he was wise to do that in every case is hugely
open to question and it can be argued that this is one of the things
that has served to undermine Methodism in a way that is not true of
the Baptist cause.
Saul, David and Solomon
all reigned for lengthy periods (around 40 years). When we think of
the kings of Judah we notice that only eight of the 20 or more
reigned 25 years or more. The statistics:
Asa 41 years; Jehoshaphat
25 years; Joash 40 years; Amaziah 29 years;
Uzziah (Azariah), 52
years; Hezekiah, 29 years; Manasseh, 55 years; Josiah 31 years.
If you know your kings you will immediately notice that, apart from Manasseh
(the exception that proves the rule perhaps), these were all kings
who were pronounced good.
In the case of Joash, you remember, however, that he only did
what was right in the eyes of the LORD all the years of Jehoiada the
priest (1
Chronicles 24:2). The last 11 years of Uzziah's reign were clouded by
his proud act of entering the temple to offer incense punished by
leprosy and even the final years of Hezekiah were not exactly without
their problems. These are important further caveats.
So
we may say, in general, that kings who served a long time were good
kings – men such as David, Solomon, Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah and
Josiah and that men who were kings for a short time – such as
Abijah (3 years), Ahaziah (1 year), Amon (2 years), Jehoahaz and
Jehoachin (3 months each) were bad kings. However, we must not never
forget Manasseh, a very bad king who only repented at the very end
and Saul who started well enough but soon turned bad. We have also
mentioned Joash, Uzziah and Hezekiah and the negatives that have to
be added with regard to their reigns. Solomon is another long
reigning king whose record was not without blemish.
2 comments:
Good stuff Gary! Looking forward to the ensuing posts... Jerry
I agree brother... I made similar comments in one of Carey Conference messages in 2009... Jerry
Post a Comment