The similar phrase 'Worldly Christianity' is one used by Bonhoeffer. It's J Gresham Machen that I want to line up most closely with. See his Christianity and culture here. Having done commentaries on Proverbs (Heavenly Wisdom) and Song of Songs (Heavenly Love), a matching title for Ecclesiastes would be Heavenly Worldliness. For my stance on worldliness, see 3 posts here.
Showing posts with label The Philippines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Philippines. Show all posts

Lord's Day September 20 2024



We had a good day last Lord's Day. I was preaching morning and evening. In the morning we looked at the last section of the Sermon on the Mount, such a sobering passage. An added bonus was the presence of the Saywell family, over from the Philippines, where they have known great blessing. Reuben reported and spoke to the children, which made things a bit longer but it was okay. New Iranians continue to come. Not much English. Eleri entertained 22 of us here for lunch. Amazing! In the evening we were back down to 12 or so but it was good to look at 2 Chronicles 4 and learn more aboit the Temple and its lessons.

GBM Prayer Meeting for work in The Philippines


For all its faults, zoom can be a great thing. It was a joy this morning to join the prayer meeting organised by GBM for the Philippines. We were joined by Aries Liboro and Reuben Saywell, who reported back on the work they are doing. This was followed by time for prayer in groups. We were about 45 altogether. It was not under ideal circumstances in that I was in the car between home and Hanwell being driven by my wife as I wanted to be in the conference in Ealing again. I got most of it, however, and it was a good start to the day.

Farewell Saywells Saywell Farewells

Myself, Cathy, Geoff Thomas, Reuben, Andrew Saywell

I am rather behind with things here but last Saturday it was a great joy to be in Folkestone for the farewell service for Reuben and Cathy Saywell who hope soon to be in The Philippines. The Saywells are being sent by Grace Baptist, Folkestone and are working with GBM. My father-in-law Geoff Thomas preached and Andrew, myself, Geoff and Andrew prayed for them after a presentation by Reuben. Great to see so many there.

Midweek Meeting October 27 2021


We had a special last night on zoom. We got to know Reuben and Cathey Saywell when Reuben was a student in London Seminary and we have been pleased to know of their intention to work for the Lord in The Philippines under the umbrella of GBM. It was an opportunity last night for a Bible study and a report from Reuben. We started a little late due to a technical hitch but we had a good number present and it was a good evening.

Lord's Day July 21 2019

THE CURSE OF SELF-CONFIDENCE

I felt it was a very good day yesterday. I seemed to be able to pray well, which is not always the case I confess and the preaching was clear and to the point I hope. The only hiccough was missing the second hymn in the morning but that is not big deal (I had listened to most of the Keswick meeting on Radio 4 that morning and thought there was too much singing and not enough time for the "talk" as they called it, perhaps it was an unconscious protest on my part). Numbers were not great in the morning or evening - it's that time of the year. However, it was nice to have an old Filipina friend with us and another who hope to come regularly in future plus a local Nigerian lady who came for the first time last week. It was also to see a fomer Muslim member back after several weeks missing owing chiefly to a family crisis. In the morning we were saying goodbye to the Saywells who have been with us during their time at Childs Hill. We will miss them. Reuben is going to be working in Maidenbower Baptist. We had communion before the evening service and then I preached on Matthew 26:30-35 to ten people. The sermon was chockful with illustrations which we were all happy about I think. I recently started a sermon illustration blog, which may grow to a decent size. See here.

Midweek Meeting January 17 2018


The seminary students are all back and so we were almost back to full strength on Wednesday. We were mostly men. One of them Reuben, took an extended trip to the far east with his family and so, after I had very briefly said something on Romans 8:32, he reported to us on his time in The Philippines and especially the work of the Cubao Reformed Baptist Church including its CCM work among street kids. It was good to be reminded of this stirling work. We had a very good prayer time, almost everyone praying and the prayers flowing as one always longs for but sometimes doesn't get. We had a church members meeting the next day so I finsihed promptly.

Lord's Day February 15 2015

We started using our new NIV Bibles yesterday. We have taken our time over this and are not entirely happy about having to change but the 1984 Bibles are wearing out and only 2011 Bibles can be had. The 2011 edition seeks to be gender neutral but has also made other changes from the 1984 edition, mostly for the good. Another thing yesterday was that all our Filipino friends came to the morning service at once, which was nice (many of them work in care homes and cannot come every week). We started the day with the first of a series of sessions on Bitesize Theology looking at the doctrines of God and Jesus. About 8 came. I wish there had been more. I preached from Ezra 5:1-6:12 in the morning and carried on in the Sermon on the Mount in the evening, looking at the sixth commandment. We also had communion before the evening service when we looked at John 12. That was a blessing. So a good day all in all. It's half term this week so some were ill as they began to take the foot of the gas.

CCM Focus Day London

An excellent day at St John's Wood Road today for the focus on Christian Compassion Ministries and their work in Manila among deprived children. Paul Relf, chairman of the UK committee, chaired and John T and Virgie Sparrow led with Catherine Gacutan, currently visiting. A lot of thought had been put into the day and all sorts of things were utilised in order to make it a truly multi media, multi sensory experience. There was a mock up slum dwelling (which was even "on fire" at one stage), a scale model of the girls' home, Skype calls with Brian Ellis and others, lots of video footage and pictures, plenty of news, some prayer and worship, even a Filipino merienda or snack at one point. I do believe I even heard Susan Boyle singing. About 60 or 70 gathered. Pity there weren't more. Several of us have been to Manila but whether you had been or not, it was a real opportunity to get the experience. Hopefully this will stir people to pray and to give to the most worthy work.

Heroes

We had one of my heroes with us last night - Brian Ellis of Manila. It was great just to have an update on the work of Cubao Reformed Baptist church and the wider work. I was gratified to see such a  good turn out. Men like Brian and Keith Underhill in Kenya who have just gone and given their lives to establishing Reformed Bapatist churches are the giants of our day - real ordinary men but men used by God in wonderful ways. Check out CRBC here on Facebook.

Lord's Day September 09 2012

I've been a bit slow getting back to the weekly reports I started doing before the holidays. I missed saying something about my first Sunday back last week when I preached on John 3:1, 2a and Romans 12:1. This last Sunday it was John 3:2bc, 3 and Galatians 6:9, 10. Both in the evening service and at an after meeting Virgie Biala from Manila spoke to us about herself and her work for CCM among needy children. It was nice to have so many there for the meetings. The picture shows Virgie and her chauffeur John T Sparrow and a few of us from Childs Hill. For more on CCM see here.

GBA 2011 06

At 2.30 pm this afternoon we had a short and happy business meeting where 55 messengers from 34 different churches. Then at 5 pm we had an excellent news session.
Brian Ellis showed a slide presentation on the work in the Philippines. Crawford Gribbin said a little bit about the church he belongs to in Port Laois.
David Butler from EMF spoke about the encouraging work of Andrew and Vivian Birch in Majorca. The only discouraging factor here is the lack of conversions among the indigenous people. Daniel Webber retires soon to be succeeded by martin Leech. Iorg Muller will be coming from Germany to carry on Martin's work.
Walter Johnston is a regular at the Assembly and it was encouraging and challenging to hear him talk about the prison work that he and others from the church are involved in.
Adam Laughton reminded us of his imminent move south to be involved in the London Gateway church planting project which will now begin in West Gravesend.
Martin Grubb flagged up a forthcoming conference with Jim Renihan Roots that refresh.
Finally, a London pastor spoke of the beginning of opportunities in the local mosque in East London.

Grace Assembly 2010 News

We had a business session this afternoon which went well. We also had a photo opportunity at tea time. Then we had a news session featuring various items under the chairmanship of Stephen Rees.
We began with Pastor Ismael Montejo being interviewed by Matt Gamston. Pastor Ismael is a pastor in the church in Cubao, Quezon City, Philippines where I was last year. He is a fascinating fellow as he was converted while working as a young man in Saudi Arabia at a Filipino underground church. He spoke about the church there briefly and its various important ministries. Jim Sayers prayed.
We also had another opportunity to hear from Jeyakanth Selverajah who is currently in the UK because of the uncertain situation in Sri Lanka. This was supplemented by an introduction to Lanka Evangelical Fellowship by Barry Owen. John Hall prayed.
Then there was an encouraging report by Alec Taylor on the growing work with Pilgrim Bible Notes. There were also reports on the need for more room in Lower Ford Street in Coventry by Peter Cordle and the Open Air Mission by Geoff Cox. Jack Jenner closed the session in prayer. After he had done so Stephen was prompted to ask about Ulverston, where there is great need at present.

"Funny old world"

These two bizarre stories highlighted in Private Eye this week struck me as rather sad and all too true to life.
'My Way' deaths lead karaoke bars in Philippines to ban song
Frank Sinatra's "My Way" has been banned from many bars across the Philippines after at least six people were killed in the last decade while performing karaoke renditions of the song.
The so-called "My Way killings" have led to many bars in the karaoke-obsessed country removing the song from their playlists amid fears of violence.
Bar owners believe the number of deaths could be fuelled by what some perceive as "arrogance" in the lyrics of the song.
It is one of the most popular karaoke tunes in the Philippines which also has a more than one million illegally carried guns.
Most of the killings are reported to have happened after the singer sang out of tune and crowds jeered.
In one fatal case Romy Baligula, 29, was shot dead in the city of San Mateoin in 2007. He was halfway through My Way when a security guard shouted that he was out of tune. He carried on regardless and the guard shot him in the chest with a revolver.
Karaoke killings have been recorded elsewhere in Asia. In Thailand two years ago a man shot dead eight of his neighbours after becoming enraged when they repeatedly sang John Denver's Take Me Home, Country Roads.
In 2008 Abdul Sani Doli hogged the microphone for so long in Sandakan, Borneo that listeners stabbed him to death.
Rodolfo Gregorio, 63, a karaoke singer in the Philippine city of General Santos, said: "The trouble with My Way is that everyone knows it and everyone has an opinion. You can get killed."

Kenya: Thousands pray for pastors to rise from dead
The faithful of a church sect in western Kenya are refusing to bury two pastors killed a week ago in a road accident, hoping they will rise from the dead like Jesus.
Patrick Wanjohi and Francis Kamau Ndekei, of the Kingdom Seekers Fellowship, died on February 15, but overseer and self-styled apostle John Kimani said they were “just sleeping, they are not dead”.
“We are not going to bury them, because they have not completed their mission here on Earth. We need them back because without them the church will collapse,” he said.
Kimani had promised the faithful that “the two pastors would resurrect” on Saturday. Thousands braved torrential rain but nothing happened.
Now hundreds continue to pray round the clock for the miracle to happen.
Apparently the decision was eventually taken to bury the pastors.
There is a youtube video on this latter story here.
What a need for sober and faithful Bible teaching there is.

Let him give

This is quoted from a Gibert MacAdam prayer letter in the December Banner. I thought it was challenging and inspiring.

One Sunday morning I was waiting to begin the service when a particular family, who have recently started coming, arrived and took their seats. Their little boy of about 8 years of age then came over to me and put a plastic bag into my hands. It was extremely heavy and I said, ‘What’s this?’ He said, ‘I want to give my savings for the poor people who were flooded.’ In the bag was a large tin full of coins. Afterwards it took about 6 people to sort and count it. The total came to 1487 pesos (about £20/$32). It was obvious that he had been saving up for a long time, and he gave the lot to help the flood victims in the Philippines. I was very moved. We plan to visit other areas with relief aid. Please continue to pray for these desperately needy people as we try to show the love of Christ in a practical way as well as spreading the word of the gospel.

Updating you


Last Wednesday we had a visit from a friend I met in The Philippines. Joel or Jose Reuel had come over to be best man to his friend Reddy at the wedding to Naomi Clarke in Kent the other week. He had also spent time in Suffolk and in Southampton before spending his final night here in Childs Hill. I briefly interviewed him at the Wednesday night meeting about the floods and how he came to faith as a 15 year old. His mother is in the Cubao church but his father is a bishop in a Filipino cult. Joel is a deacon in the church and hopes to begin studies at the Grace Ministerial Academy next June.
On the Thursday we went up to see Kenwood House and then in the evening I took him to Heathrow. It was nice to meet Mr Clarke and one of his daughters briefly when they dropped in with Joel's case.
Friday was busy day in the study and speaking at the clubs (on the widow of Nain) restarting after half term. The younger one were making key hooks and we had some Madlib fun in the older club.
On Saturday we headed for Wales where we dropped in on Eleri's brother-in-law and family as it is Glyn's fortieth this week. Eleri's other sister and family were also there en route to Aberystwyth. It was Osian's second birthday (already!) the other day. We came back over the old bridge - the novelty is beginning to wear off. We were not back too late.
Remembrance Sunday went off okay with the two minute silence and lunch after church. I preached on Jesus words against the teachers of the law in Mark 12 and the end of Romans 3. The morning congregation was quite large for us. The evening congregation was not large. People were slow to leave, which is nice.

Calvin Theologian 07

On the Lord's Supper
Book 4 of the Institutes deals with the subject of the church. Baptists perhaps wish to disagree with him more here than anywhere else but there is still a great deal that we can agree with. In Chapter 14 he has a general chapter on the sacraments then come in turn two chapters on baptism and two on the Lord's Supper. The second of the two chapters on the Supper is largely negative but the one before it (Chapter 17) is a positive attempt to deal with the subject in a biblical manner. In over 50 sections he sets out his views and what he has to say deserves carefully examination and weighing up. He also published a short practical book on the subject in French in 1540.
The Battles edition covers around 60 pages and is divided into 50 parts. These can be further grouped under some 9 headings. The first three would be
1. The Lord's Supper with the signs of bread and wine provides spiritual food (1-3)
2. The promises sealed in the Supper as we are made partakers of Christ's flesh – a mystery felt rather than explained (4-7)
3. This life giving communion is brought about by the Holy Spirit (8-10)
The chapters that follow concern difficult controversies over the Supper that need to be resolved by the Word. The first of these is the relationship of the bread in the supper to the body of Christ (12-37). Calvin begins by looking at the Roman doctrine of transubstantiation (12-19). He calls it superstition and mocks the very idea (17.12). If it is true why is there no corresponding change in the water of baptism? This is not what the church believed in times past and is a Satan inspired innovation.
Next he turns to the Lutheran doctrine (20-34). Following the lead of Joachim Westphal, many Lutherans tended to believe in what is called the ubiquity of Christ. This teaches that Christ's body has the divine attribute of omnipresence. When Jesus said “This is my body” he was using metonymy (as in John's “Behold the Lamb of God”). Calvin opposes Lutheran consubstantiation as much as Roman transubstantiation. Indeed, it is worse in that it denies the ascension of Christ.
Robert Godfrey points out that Calvin's animus against the Lutheran doctrine was partly because it divided Protestants where there should be no need for division. Though accused of rationalism by the Lutherans, as ever Calvin was simply seeking to be true to Scripture. He says of Christ's drawing near by outward symbol and the inward work of the Spirit “Now, if anyone should ask me how this takes place, I shall not be ashamed to confess that it is a secret too lofty for either my mind to comprehend or my words to declare. And, to speak more plainly, I rather experience than understand it. Therefore, I here embrace without controversy the truth of God in which I may safely rest.” (17.32). By taking the line that he did Calvin was able to “hold that men bear away from this Sacrament no more than they gather with the vessel of faith” and even if unbelievers partake “just as rain falling upon a hard rock flows off because no entrance opens into the stone, the wicked by their hardness so repel God’s grace that it does not reach them. Besides, to say that Christ may be received without faith is as inappropriate as to say that a seed may germinate in fire.” (17.33)
Calvin's view then can be called a spiritual one. Van der Zee summarises “Through the sacrament we have access to all the blessings of our union with Christ because by the Spirit we are lifted up and brought into his presence.” There is a real reception of the body and blood of Christ in the supper but in a spiritual manner. The sacrament is a real means of grace, a channel by which Christ communicates himself to us. He agreed with Luther the Supper involves communion with a present Christ who actually feeds believers with his body and blood. The question was how Christ's body exists and is given to believers. For Calvin, while Christ is bodily in heaven, the distance is overcome by the Holy Spirit, who vivifies believers with Christ's flesh. Thus the Supper is a true communion with Christ, who feeds us with his body and blood. Elsewhere Calvin wrote “We must hold in regard to the mode, that it is not necessary that the essence of the flesh should descend from heaven in order to our being fed upon it, the virtue of the Spirit being sufficient to break through all impediments and surmount any distance of place.” The real difference between Luther and Calvin lay in the present existence of Christ's body. Calvin held that it is in a place, Heaven, while Luther said that it has the same omnipresence as Christ's divine nature.
As for Zwingli, he did not accept a 'real' presence of Christ in the Supper, and did not see a real feeding of the faithful on him. He believed that Christ was present in and through the faith of the participants, but that this presence was not tied to the elements and depended completely on the faith of the communicants. He interpreted the sacrament as a commemoration of the death of Christ, in which the church responded to grace already given, rather than a vehicle of grace.
Calvin's view has been attacked by later Reformed writers such as Turretin and through him Charles Hodge. R L Dabney said of the view that “it is not only incomprehensible, but impossible.” This seems over harsh.
Finally (35-37) Calvin writes against the idolatrous and superstitious adoration of the elements that is part of the Roman Mass.
The second set of issues tackled (38-42) is the need for faith and love in those who take communion. Rome stressed the need of holiness to come to the table but Calvin rightly puts the stress on a sense of sin and unworthiness. He says “Let us remember that this sacred feast is medicine for the sick, solace for sinners, alms to the poor; but would bring no benefit to the healthy, righteous, and rich - if such could be found. For since in it Christ is given to us as food, we understand that without him we would pine away, starve, and faint - as famine destroys the vigour of the body. Then, since he is given us unto life, we understand that without him in us we would plainly be dead. Therefore, this is the worthiness - the best and only kind we can bring to God - to offer our vileness and (so to speak) our unworthiness to him so that his mercy may make us worthy of him; to despair in ourselves so that we may be comforted in him; to abase ourselves so that we may be lifted up by him; to accuse ourselves so that we may be justified by him”. He also speaks of the importance of expressing our unity in Christ.
As for the proper celebration of the Lord’s Supper (43-50) Calvin says that it should be done “at least once a week”. He quotes Augustine and Chrysostom in favour of regular participation and condemns the practice of communicating only once a year. He unsurprisingly opposes communion in one kind, turning to Scripture and history to make his case.

Calvin Theologian 06

On Prayer
In Book 3 Calvin comes to living the Christian life and the work of the Spirit. Warfield famously wrote that “the fundamental interest of Calvin as a theologian lay, it is clear, in the region broadly designated soteriological. Perhaps” he suggested “we may go further and add that, within this broad field, his interest was most intense in the application to the sinful soul of the salvation wrought out by Christ, ... Its effect, at all events, has been to constitute Calvin pre-eminently the theologian of the Holy Spirit.”
This is most clearly seen in Book 3 where he talks about many things including faith, confession, repentance, the Christian life, justification, good works and later election, calling and resurrection. Chapter 20 is taken up with the subject of prayer. It has been said that you can tell a lot about a theologian when you see how much time he spends on prayer. Calvin certainly does not neglect the subject. Chapter 20 is 74 pages long (Battles online edition) with 52 chapters and has been referred to as a “minitreatise” (Jim Packer/Carolyn Nystrom). One of the longest chapters in the book, Battles calls it a “thoughtful and ample chapter, with its tone of devout warmth” and accords it a place “in the forefront of historically celebrated discussions of prayer”. David Calhoun recently commended its “balance, clarity, scriptural faithfulness and pastoral tone”. It has rightly been published as a little work in its own right.
Parker suggests that the Institutes “reaches its climax” with this chapter. Calhoun says “a Christian praying on his or her knees praying can be seen as the goal” to which Calvin “has been moving from page one”. Joel Beeke notes that “Calvin focuses more on the practice of prayer than on its doctrine, which shows how practical his theology is. For Calvin, prayer is the essence of the Christian life; it is a precious gift, not an academic problem.” Partee says “That John Calvin's personal faith and public witness is practical and experiential rather than speculative and logical is nowhere better demonstrated than in his exposition of the miracle of prayer.”
For Calvin prayer was not mere theory. Elsie McKee says that he “seems to have accompanied almost every public act with prayer”. His wonderful prayers can be found in many of his writings. After lecturing on Daniel in the lions' den he prayed “Grant, Almighty Father, since you show us, by the example of your servant Daniel, how we ought to persevere with consistency in sincerely worshipping you, and thus proceed towards true greatness of mind, that we may truly devote ourselves to you. May we not be turned aside in any direction through the desire of men, but may we persist in our holy calling, and so conquer all dangers and arrive at length at the fruit of victory - that happy immortality which is laid up for us in heaven, through Christ our Lord Amen.”
What Calvin says about prayer has been divided into eight unequal parts. He speaks first of prayer's necessity (1-3). “After we have been instructed by faith to recognise that whatever we need and whatever we lack is in God, and in our Lord Jesus Christ, ... it remains for us to seek in him, and in prayers to ask of him, what we have learned to be in him.” He defines prayer as “a communion of men with God by which, having entered the heavenly sanctuary, they appeal to him in person concerning his promises in order to experience, where necessity so demands, that what they believed was not vain, although he had promised it in word alone. Therefore we see that to us nothing is promised to be expected from the Lord, which we are not also bidden to ask of him in prayers. So true is it that we dig up by prayer the treasures that were pointed out by the Lord’s gospel, and which our faith has gazed upon.” God, he says “has laid down this order: just as faith is born from the gospel, so through it our hearts are trained to call upon God’s name.” He deals with the objection that prayer is not necessary God being all knowing. God “ordained it not so much for his own sake as for ours”.
He gives six overlapping reasons to pray: to stir zeal, conform minds to God's will, promote thankfulness, help more ardent meditation on God's kingdom, help us embrace with greater delight what we gain and confirm to our minds that God is a never failing help in every need. Herman Selderhuis observes that for Calvin “prayer has a greater interest in honouring God than in changing him.” It is important not to overstate this, however, as Calvin gives full weight to the biblical idea that prayer in some way affects God. He speaks of God being “stirred up by our prayers”. As Bruce Ware has argued Calvin does teach that prayer makes a difference. It is “a divinely ordained instrument functioning within the sphere of God's sovereign wisdom and power in carrying out his will”. He is more concerned to be biblical than to over rationalise.
Secondly, he sets down four rules for prayer or “conversation with God” (4-16). These are not precise rules as such but attitudes we need in order to pray:
1. A sense of reverence, which includes being “moved by God's majesty”, concentration of mind, moderation in requests and reliance on the Holy Spirit.
2. A sense of insufficiency, neediness and penitence. Here he speaks of the need to really desire what we pray for, to keep from mere words in prayer, from mere moods and always to pray with repentance.
3. A sense of humility, giving all the glory to God. He gives biblical examples of self-abasement in prayer and says that seeking forgiveness is the most important part in prayer. Speaks of the need for general and special confession of sin in prayer and deals with claims of righteousness found in some Bible prayers.
4. A sense of hope and assurance of an answer. Hope must accompany fear. By faith we must believe what Scripture says and trust that God is good. He also deals with answers to prayers that are no conformed to the Word and instances where in the Bible men of God pray against God's will.
Of course, it is God 's kindness that leads to answers to prayers not merely following rules. Even though we often fail to pray as we should God is gracious to us.
Calvin's third section can be headed Christ the only intercessor (17-20). The biblical teaching about Christ as the one mediator and the only eternal and lasting intercessor is asserted. In contrast, the following polemical section (21-27) deals with the Roman doctrine of the intercession of the saints, refuting it from Scripture. Parker sums up Calvin's thought thus: “it is, then, not simply a matter of praying through Christ, but rather with Christ, of our prayers being united with his intercession for us”.
Next he deals with private (28) and public prayer (29-33). In the chapter on private prayer the emphasis is on thanksgiving. The succeeding chapters deal with the necessity and danger of public prayer (chiefly vain repetition and hypocrisy), the significance of buildings, singing, the need to use a language people understand and the matter of feeling, thought and gesture. Interestingly he says that Christ taught that “the chief part of his worship lies in the office of prayer” (29).
The seventh section is something that was there in embryo from the very first edition - a very full exposition of the Lord's Prayer (34-49), which Calvin sees as a pattern prayer that can be divided into six (not seven) petitions in two parts, concerning first God and then our own needs. We have no time to go through what he says here but to give one quotation to help you get the flavour. On Lead us not into temptation he says “here we seek to be equipped with such armour and defended with such protection that we may be able to win the victory. By this we are instructed that we need not only the grace of the Spirit, to soften our hearts within and to bend and direct them to obey God, but also his aid, to render us invincible against both all the stratagems and all the violent assaults of Satan.” (46).
The final section (50-52) is on perseverance in prayer, including the matter of unanswered prayers. God “even when he does not comply with our wishes, is still attentive and kindly to our prayers” (52).

Observations lessons


Well, I'm back from my trip to the Philippines. Time to try and gather together some observations and lessons. These are slightly random and are obviously drawn from my experience chiefly of Manila and mainly among Christians.

1. Manila is pretty monocultural. It would seem being made up of around 99% Filipinos. I hardly saw any people of another ethnic background.
2. Having said that, Filipinos themselves are pretty diverse. They can look quite different - some more Chinese or more Indian, some more Malay or even African or Polynesian.
3. Although (Americanised) English and Tagalog are widely spoken many, many have a third or even a fourth language as there are over 150 other languages and 13 major languages are spoken by 90% of the country. This means that communication is a more of a problem than appears at first.
4. Although the people are Asian they seem to have a unique mixture of American get up and go (and southern politeness), Spanish lording it over and various other elements in their make up.
5. In Manila there is wide diversity between the very rich and the very poor.
6. People seem generally to be keen on hygiene, especially oral hygiene, but things can look quite run down due to neglect.
7. I need to send more time consulting maps. There is a lot to be learned from such sources.
8. The Philippines is a land where a little bit can go a long, long way.
9. One must constantly resist the temptation to make snap judgements with regard to people and situations.
10. False doctrine, immorality, party spirit and a general tendency to drift apart make themselves known the world over.
11. There is something to be said for being quite consciously and overtly Reformed in doctrine.
12. It is quite striking to see what God can do with a church that is committed to the truth adn to God's glory.
13. The more the people and the more a work grows the more likely problems of various sorts are.
14. Face to face is always going to beat a written report or photos

Pineapples

Truth is I just hadn't really thought it through but if woken from sleep and asked if pineapples grew on trees I would have said yes. I learned in Tagaytay the other day that is not the case. Now I know.
More here.

Calvin Theologian 05

On Christ's Threefold Office
Having looked at the knowledge of God as Creator in Book 1, Calvin comes in Book 2 to the knowledge of God as Redeemer in Christ. Beginning with man's Fall and his consequent depravity, he begins to speak about how God works in men’s hearts. He refutes the idea of free will and begins to explain the need of a Mediator, demonstrating how this has been brought about, first under the old covenant then under the new. In Chapter 8 he takes up nearly 60 pages famously explaining the proper threefold use of the Law and expounding the Ten Commandments. He comes after that to the Gospel and Christ's coming, bringing in the new covenant. He discusses both the similarity of the Old and New Testaments and their big differences.
Then in the closing chapters of Book 2 he comes to Christ the Mediator. First he looks at Christ's person. He discusses the sort of Mediator we need and describes the incarnation. He explains how Christ can be one Person yet have two natures, one human, one divine. Finally, he talks in Chapter 15 about Christ's office, in Chapter 16 about his states (as set out in the Apostles' Creed) and in Chapter 17 about his substitutionary atonement. It is Chapter 15 that I want to focus on today, the chapter where Calvin says that “in order that faith may find a firm basis for salvation in Christ, and thus rest in him, this principle must be laid down: the office enjoined upon Christ by the Father consists of three parts. For he was given to be prophet, king, and priest.” Derek Thomas calls it a “segue” between 16 and 17 and quotes Robert Peterson saying it “was Calvin's way of telling his readers not to separate the person and work of Christ.”
Derek Thomas also calls the employment of the threefold office of Christ as Prophet, Priest and King “perhaps one of the most distinctive features of Calvin's theology”. Warfield spoke of Calvin marking “an epoch in the mode of presenting the work of Christ. The presentation of Christ's work under the rubrics of the three-fold office of Prophet, Priest and King was introduced by him.” Not that it came to him easily. In the 1536 and 1539 editions he still speaks only of a twofold office, of priest and king. It is not until 1543 that we read about the threefold office. He looks at the three offices, one by one – Prophet, Priest and King.
Prophet
Citing Hebrews 1;1, 2 he states that with Christ's coming “the fullness and culmination of all revelations was at hand.” (15.1) Even the Samaritans expected Messiah to teach them all things. Isaiah 61:1, 2 refers to Messiah being anointed by the Spirit “to be herald and witness of the Father’s grace”. His coming with perfection means the end to all other prophecy. By the Spirit he continues from heaven the work begun on earth. The anointing has been “diffused from the Head to the members”. That is why “it is not lawful to go beyond the simplicity of the gospel.” “The prophetic dignity in Christ leads us to know that in the sum of doctrine as he has given it to us all parts of perfect wisdom are contained.” (15.2)

King
He comes secondly to Christ's kingship. This is a spiritual kingship. He is King over the church and over each individual believer. “The perpetuity of the church is secure in” Christ's protection. The Psalms reveal that “no matter how many strong enemies plot to overthrow the church, they do not have sufficient strength to prevail over God’s immutable decree by which he appointed, his Son eternal King.” The application to individuals is that “when any one of us hears that Christ’s kingship is spiritual, aroused by this word let him attain to the hope of a better life; and since it is now protected by Christ’s hand, let him await the full fruit of this grace in the age to come.” (15.3).
He goes on to emphasise that “the happiness promised us in Christ does not consist in outward advantages - such as leading a joyous and peaceful life, having rich possessions, being safe from all harm, and abounding with delights such as the flesh commonly longs after. No, our happiness belongs to the heavenly life!” (15.4) Christ supplies all that we need to bring us to heaven so all we need do is look to him. This is a passage today's prosperity gospel peddlers would do well to read!
“Thus it is that we may patiently pass through this life with its misery, hunger, cold, contempt, reproaches, and other troubles - content with this one thing: that our King will never leave us destitute, but will provide for our needs until, our warfare ended, we are called to triumph. Such is the nature of his rule, that he shares with us all that he has received from the Father. Now he arms and equips us with his power, adorns us with his beauty and magnificence, enriches us with his wealth. These benefits, then, give us the most fruitful occasion to glory, and also provide us with confidence to struggle fearlessly against the devil, sin, and death. Finally, clothed with his righteousness, we can valiantly rise above all the world’s reproaches; and just as he himself freely lavishes his gifts upon us, so may we, in return, bring forth fruit to his glory.” (15.4)
The final section further stresses the spiritual nature of Christ's Kingship. He stresses too that it was all done for us, hence “All the more reason, then, is there that we should one and all resolve to obey, and to direct our obedience with the greatest eagerness to the divine will!” (15.5).

Priest
Calvin also speaks briefly “concerning the purpose and use of Christ’s priestly office”. “As a pure and stainless Mediator” says Calvin “he is by his holiness to reconcile us to God.” (15.6) However, we are unacceptable to God by nature and so Christ has to act as Priest for us and by a sacrifice appease God's wrath. This sis set out in the Old Testament Scriptures and discussed at length by the writer to the Hebrews. Calvin sums up the argument of Hebrews 7-10 in these terms: “The priestly office belongs to Christ alone because by the sacrifice of his death he blotted out our own guilt and made satisfaction for our sins. God’s solemn oath, of which he 'will not repent' warns us what a weighty matter this is: 'You are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek'. God undoubtedly willed in these words to ordain the principal point on which, he knew, our whole salvation turns. For, as has been said, we or our prayers have no access to God unless Christ, as our High Priest, having washed away our sins, sanctifies us and obtains for us that grace from which the uncleanness of our transgressions and vices debars us. Thus we see that we must begin from the death of Christ in order that the efficacy and benefit of his priesthood may reach us.” (15.6).
Calvin also speaks of Christ's everlasting intercession, his pleading in heaven for our favour. It is this that enables us to pray confidently and know peace of conscience. In Christ, not only is the Father reconciled but we too are made acceptable priests to God. We are “imbued with his holiness in so far as he has consecrated us to the Father with himself, although we would otherwise be loathsome to him”. (15.6).
Derek Thomas suggests three things worth noting in this brief treatment.
1. The use of Old Testament types and shadows as seen “through the lens of the book of Hebrews”.
2. The need for the Mediator to be both human and divine. “Although God under the law commanded animal sacrifices to be offered to himself, in Christ there was a new and different order, in which the same one was to be both priest and sacrifice. This was because no other satisfaction adequate for our sins, and no man worthy to offer to God the only-begotten Son, could be found.” (15.6). Elsewhere Calvin stresses the need for the Mediator to be divine.
3. His atoning work complete Christ continues to be an eternal intercessor. “Having entered a sanctuary not made with hands, he appears before the Father’s face as our constant advocate and intercessor” (16.6).